Do you like FordForum.org? Link to us and help spread the word about our forum. Thanks!
Ingalls FastCam Bolts Installed |
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 09:23 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
I recieved my FastCam Bolts early this week. Before installing them I
wanted before and after measurements of the camber settings. Since at this
point my main interest is to improve rearend traction I decided to only
install the rear bolts for now. Initial camber measurements taken at NTB
were:
-0.6 degrees for the left rear
-0.3 degrees for the right rear
I have now intalled the FastCam bolts in the rear and adjusted them for
maximum negitive camber, and will take another measurement before the
weekend. Initial test runs around town were positive in that it appears to
have improved rear end traction during hard cornering, as the car is more
forgiving while breaking in hard corners, but it still seems to break into a
oversteer situations very violently, but with the new found traction it is
less likely. I will have a more detailed option after my competition this
weekend.
Enjoy,
Bryan Pendleton
http://probenet.tripod.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 10:37 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Overstear? Really? My car is just the opposite. What have you
done to your suspension?
"Pendleton,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 10:38 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Eibach Pro Springs, 17" wheels with 215/40 tires and Addco rear sway bar.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 10:50 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
You'd think the Addco rear sway bar would have fixed any
overstear problems. Are your Eibach springs meant for the SE, or
the GT? Ones meant for the GT would be much stiffer in the front
than ones for the SE, thus the front would not slide out very
easily. Does Eibach even make springs specifically for the SE? I
can't imagine wheels making much of a difference in this case.
"Pendleton,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 11:34 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Its just the opposite, the addition of a larger rear swaybar reduces
understeer but increases oversteer. The springs are specifically for the
2.0L Probe/MX-6
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 02:06 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
The SE and GT use the same set of Eibach springs, although this may have
changed
recently since Eibach now only lists the GT spring set for all models of
Probes 93-97.
But when we put Eibachs on we used the 5522.140. Now Eibach did make a
5527.140
which I think was intended for Base probes, with a different front
spring rate. Bryan, what kind
of tires do you have on you PSE? My brother uses A520's (in the same
215/40 size) and they
grip like crazy, im trying to get him on an Autocross course before the
season ends, because I
dont think anyone in our region has raced on A520, Im curious to see how
they do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 02:16 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Please don't bring up tires. I am currently running with Nitto 450's or
something like that. Traction is lousy, period. It is a high thread where
rating tire, that just wasn't designed for traction. The Yoko A520 is what
I plan on going with for my next set of tires, if they still even carry it
in my size by the time I need some more tires. I looks almost like they are
replacing the A520 with the AVS's, cause everytime I pick up a magazine
their are less A520's listed and more AVS's. Encouraging to know you like
the A520's. A few people at the Solo event run them, it seems to be a good
tire for the new ST (Street Touring) class, even though BFG makes some
better one they cost literally twice as much.
Bryan
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 02:58 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
How does that work? Wouldn't a larger rear sway bar make the rear
wheels 'stick' better, resulting in more understeer? Or do I have
it backwards? - So if I were to add a front sway bar from a GT (I
have a base) it would increase my cars tendency to understear?
"Pendleton,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 03:04 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
What do those numbers mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 03:12 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
A sway bar prevents body roll and weight transfer (from side to side), which
is good because the less transfer in weight or the less roll you have the
quicker the car can make transitions from left to right Now when you slap a
big ole sway bar on the back of a car without balancing it with changes to
the front you will typically end up with a oversteering car, because now the
front still allows for a great deal of body roll and weight transfer, but
the rear of the drives much flater, meaning less weight on that outside
wheel during hard corning, less weight -> less traction. The key is to
balance things out, this is why I would like to get the PGT front sway bar
to compliment the Addco rear sway bar.
Enjoy,
Bryan
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 1999, 08:16 PM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Those are just part numbers for the two different spring kits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 28 1999, 02:20 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Hey Bryan,
I know this is response is late as hell. But my cousin who had the GT
front sway bar, went into that guard rail backwards if that makes since
"shrug".
~ Torrienta
2.0L Performance
www.geocities.com/Motorcity/1377
"pendleton, bryan p."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 28 1999, 09:17 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Camber is the tires vertical positioning. When you lower a car the
reduction in height of the car tends to make the top portion of the
tire lean inward. Thisw results in less of the tires surface area in
contact with the ground.by adjusting the lean or "camber" you improve
traction.
-Rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 28 1999, 09:41 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Bryan,
I have the rear sway bar and I noticed the front end would respond
after the back. After I installed a front strut brace it fixed the
problem.
-Rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 28 1999, 09:44 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Actually with the Eibach Pro Springs my rear camber was nearly 0, which of
coarse is well within specs. Actual measurements were like -0.4 and -0.6
degrees, but I have adjusted for more negative camber with the FastCam
Bolts, because during harding corning, when traction is really needed the
car rolls over to the outside wheels, so with the negative camber your
outside tire thread will actually be running flat (providing optimal
traction) due to body roll. Note that negative camber is a measure of the
tire angle from the neutral vertical position. Negative camber is when the
wheels lean into the car, top in bottom out, and positive camber is when the
bottom of the tire is in and the top is out.
When you drop your car considerably, as many of the honda guys do, by
dropping it around 3 to 4 inches or even more, if no changes are made to the
suspensison the camber is often grossly negative, 5 or more degreees and I
can assure you this amount of camber is not going to help anything. Unless
you are running Ground Controls you shouldn't have anything to worry about
concerning proper alignment. I simply wanted some rear camber for my solo
II competitions, and since the Probe has no adjustments for rear camber, I
went with the FastCam Bolts.
Enjoy,
Bryan
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 28 1999, 09:48 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
Yeah, I have been wanting to pickup the front strut bar, but heck I don't
know whats available anymore. I had ordered one along time ago, two monthes
later I called the "speed shop" and they said the "manufacturer" quite
making them. Since then a few more have poped up, FAST, Freedom Design,
etc, etc, but I haven't really looked into what is currently available now,
or compared the available bars, which I would like to do before commiting.
I still have the Road Race Engineering Rear Strut Bar in my garage, but am
reluctant to put it in simply because it will probably just increase my
oversteering problems.
Bryan
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 1999, 05:16 AM
|
Newbie
Group: Guests
Posts: 0
Joined: 14-June 08
Member No.: 240
Drives: Ford
Location: USA

|
I am sure it depends on how much you drop the car. The lower you drop the
car the more negative camber you are going to acquire, and I have no idea
how the Probe will respond.
Bryan
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Search
Get your Ford listed in the Gallery Today, for FREE, to share with the world what you drive and what toys and modifications you have.
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Random Featured Members

Random Featured Members
|
|