Lost Symbols and the Fraying of Our National Fabric

Heritage

Dec 7

Once a fabric begins to fray, the continuing unraveling of the garment is almost inevitable. Each stress, each tug, further weakens the bindings of the cloth. Unless the tear is mended before it gets too far, the garment won’t last long.

Countries are a lot like fabric—various strands are woven together to become stronger and form an entity many times stronger and more beautiful than any of its elements. The great question today is, what binds our national fabric together in the 21st century?

Once our countrymen largely shared a religious creed, a common set of ancestral origins, a language and a literature. As we grew more diverse and extended our citizenship, other, more political, secular and economic forces served as the binding agents.

Those initial bindings were documents and symbols and documents that became symbols. Those symbols and those documents, however, have been undermined and are being drained of the power to make E pluribus unum—"out of many, one.” And we are starting to see a glimpse of the price we will pay.

Rightly or wrongly, statues of people once taken to be heroes in their community have been pulled down. Names of founding fathers have been removed from schools and buildings. Historic murals have been whitewashed or otherwise covered over. We once nearly universally respected the flag; now some see it as a political symbol undeserving of their veneration and something which can be used to divide us rather than unite us.

I was in the second grade in 1976 and it was a year I will never forget. With the rest of the nation, our school celebrated the bicentennial of the Declaration of Independence and the birth of our nation. We made colonial crafts like dipping candles and made silhouettes of founding fathers. We dressed in period costumes and even made a Betsy Ross flag quilt. We flew that flag proudly as a symbol of our nation’s origins and we celebrated the woman who gifted it to the new nation. The idea that even that old flag would be attacked as a racist symbol and a major American company would bend to political pressure and remove it from one of their products would have been unimaginable to us then. We were celebrating together and seeking to unite the nation after the divisive times of Vietnam and Watergate, which we recognized as having so damaged our national fabric.

What becomes of a nation who has lost its unifying symbols? What is the fate of a nation when common values no longer overcome the divisions that are always present in the economy and in our politics and that no longer help us deal with differences in race and religion?

Like a fabric that begins to fray, a nation whose commonalities and unifying symbols have come undone will continue to rip until it comes apart or something intervenes to pull it back together again.

During the Civil War, as divided and existentially threatened as we have ever been, both North and South still held some symbols in common—including the person of George Washington and the Constitution itself. They disagreed profoundly on the origins of our union and the meaning of the Constitution, but both pointed to common symbols. Still, it took the deaths of more than 700,000 of our countrymen in a brutal civil war before the fabric of our nation could be rewoven. After the violence and bloodshed we still had common symbols that aided in our healing and rebirth.

Great civil rights leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr. pointed to the same foundational symbols that could unite America while they chastised America for its failures. They used those symbols to call on us to fulfill their promise and be worthy of our heritage. They did not tear down but built upon our common foundations. In his famous “I Have a Dream” speech, King called the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution “promissory notes” and called on us to live up to their conditions.

I ask again—What becomes of a nation when the symbols that unite us are undermined? What will be left to bind up our wounds and repair the fabric of the Republic if we have no common flag, no common heroes, no common documents to revere and to whose high ideas we might aspire?

History does not contain many examples of free peoples who are divided politically, economically, and socially remaining one strong nation for long. Even less so does its lessons give comfort for a people divided in those ways and who also no longer have common heroes, symbols, and documents to look humbly to, revere, and which can call that people to the better angels of their natures.

What becomes of such nations when the symbols that unite their people are drained of their power? They either separate peacefully, fly apart violently, are held together by the military and police force of the state, or something intervenes to pull them once more together into a common enterprise with common symbols for a common good.

There will always be radicals out to undermine our unity to promote their own cause. The rest of us should uphold those symbols and documents in the face of the challenge and we should hold corporations and politicians and news organizations to account and insist they serve our unity rather than bowing to the loudest grievances and political bullies. We should all, then, also seek common understanding beneath the symbols that have made us the United States of America with the motto E pluribus unum. Perhaps in this way the fraying of our nation’s common fabric can be arrested before the tears are irreparable.

Discussion Questions:

Why did our early leaders choose E Pluribus Unum as our motto? Is it possible to have either too much Pluribus or too much Unum?
How might that motto help us think about current controversies concerning immigration?
If that motto no longer really works for us, what substitute might we offer that accurately captures not only what we are but also what we aspire to be?